Larkin v. Wikoff
78 A. 1134, 77 N.J. Eq. 589, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 289
Opinion
So much of the decree as is involved in this appeal will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Walker in the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parke?, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Dill, Congdon — 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Larkin v. Wikoff, 78 A. 1134, 77 N.J. Eq. 589, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 289 (N.J. 1910).
78 A. 1134 (Larkin v. Wikoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tp. of Cinnaminson v. First Camden Nat. Bk. & Tr.
238 A.2d 701 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
Leeds v. Harrison
83 A.2d 45 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Morristown Trust Co. v. Protestant Episcopal Ch.
61 A.2d 762 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)
Guyer v. Trustees of the Y.M.C.A. of Trenton
60 A.2d 276 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Y.W.C.A. of Camden v. Murrelle
56 A.2d 738 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Green v. Green
36 A.2d 217 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Woulfe v. Associated Realties Corp.
23 A.2d 399 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)
In Re Young Women's Christian Asso.
126 A. 610 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1924)
Imbrie v. Steen
124 A. 155 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1924)