Larkin v. White
This text of 73 A.D.3d 1179 (Larkin v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Eisman, J.), dated April 14, 2009, which denied her motion for an award of an attorney’s fee and costs.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the mother’s contentions, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying her motion for an award of an attorney’s fee and costs (see Domestic Relations Law § 237 [b]; see generally DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879 [1987]; Matter of O’Shea v Parker, 16 AD3d 510, 511 [2005]; Matter of O’Neil v O’Neil, 193 AD2d 16, 20 [1993]). Skelos, J.P., Covello, Hall and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 A.D.3d 1179, 900 N.Y.S.2d 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larkin-v-white-nyappdiv-2010.