Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Larkin v. State

Larkin v. State

539 So. 2d 32, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 609, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1115, 1989 WL 20703
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 8, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1890
StatusPublished

This text of 539 So. 2d 32 (Larkin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larkin v. State, 539 So. 2d 32, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 609, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1115, 1989 WL 20703 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. In an earlier appeal from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief we permitted the appellant an additional 30 days to file a properly sworn motion in the trial court. The appellant failed to file a properly sworn motion within that time period. See Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985).

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. State
464 So. 2d 1171 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 So. 2d 32, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 609, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1115, 1989 WL 20703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larkin-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.