Larkin v. New York
273 U.S. 639, 47 S. Ct. 96
Opinion
Motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis denied for the reason that the edurt finds upon examination of the unprinted record that it presents no Federal question and therefore dismisses the writ of error upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power and Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Larkin v. New York, 273 U.S. 639, 47 S. Ct. 96 (1926).
273 U.S. 639 (Larkin v. New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Toop v. Ulysses Land Co.
237 U.S. 580 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham
253 U.S. 193 (Supreme Court, 1920)