Larkin v. Larkin
149 N.E.2d 338, 4 N.Y.2d 772
Opinion
Order affirmed; no opinion.
Copcur.: Chief Judge Cónway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Fboessel, Van Voobhis and Bubke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Larkin v. Larkin, 149 N.E.2d 338, 4 N.Y.2d 772 (N.Y. 1958).
149 N.E.2d 338 (Larkin v. Larkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of the Petition of Kinoshita & Co., Ltd. And Kinoshita & Co., Ltd., USA as Charterer and Agent, for an Order Directing American Oceanic Corporation, as Owner or Chartered Owner of a Vessel to Be Named, to Proceed to Arbitration in Accordance With the Terms of Its Written Agreement
287 F.2d 951 (Second Circuit, 1961)
In re Kinoshita & Co.
287 F.2d 951 (Second Circuit, 1961)