Larkin v. Koether
140 A. 920, 102 N.J. Eq. 329, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 597
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chaneellor Berry, and reported in 101 N. J. Fq. 116.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Yan Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
For modification — White, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Larkin v. Koether, 140 A. 920, 102 N.J. Eq. 329, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 597 (N.J. 1928).
140 A. 920 (Larkin v. Koether) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coastal Group v. PLANNED REAL EST.
630 A.2d 814 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
Four-G Corp. v. Ruta
138 A.2d 18 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1958)
Paradiso v. Mazejy
69 A.2d 15 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1949)