Larkin v. Koether
This text of 140 A. 920 (Larkin v. Koether) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chaneellor Berry, and reported in 101 N. J. Fq. 116.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Yan Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
For modification — White, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 A. 920, 102 N.J. Eq. 329, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larkin-v-koether-nj-1928.