Larkin v. Kelly

Fourth Circuit

Larkin v. Kelly

699 F. App'x 220

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2017·No. No. 17-6865·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Billy F. Larkin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)® (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Larkin v. Kelly, No. 5:16-ct-03230-D, 699 Fed.Appx. 220, 2017 WL 5033695 (E.D.N.C. June 13, 2017). We deny Lar-kin’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately . presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Billy F. Larkin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)® (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Larkin v. Kelly, No. 5:16-ct-03230-D, 699 Fed.Appx. 220, 2017 WL 5033695 (E.D.N.C. June 13, 2017). We deny Lar-kin’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately . presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Larkin v. Kelly, 699 F. App'x 220 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

699 F. App'x 220 (Larkin v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related