Larkin v. City of Darien

Supreme Court of Georgia

Larkin v. City of Darien

69 Ga. 727

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 30, 1883

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 69 Ga. 727 (Larkin v. City of Darien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Larkin v. City of Darien, 69 Ga. 727 (Ga. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

JACKSON, Chief Justice.

[A horse was levied on under a fi.fa. for municipal taxes due the city of Darien', by Mrs. Larkin. It was taken from the premises of the defendant, her son being present at the time. She begged for time, and at her instance, a sale was postponed for over twelve months, nothing being said during that time indicating that it was not her property. (The exact age of the son is not given, but he was a minor.) When the marshal finally advertised the horse for sale, the son, by next friend, interposed a claim. The case was tried before the commissioners of McIntosh county, who were ex-officio mayor, etc., of Darien. Claimant tendered a bill of sale from one Stevens, conveying the horse in question to claimant, in consideration of $18.00. This was signed by a cross mark, but its execution was sworn to by the father of claimant. The court held the bill of [728]*728sale to be a nullity, because there was no attesting witness. Claimant'and his father testified that the possession had been in him ; that he had purchased the horse from Stevens, and owned it. The horse was found subject, and claimant carried the case to the superior court by certiorari. The answer to the writ showed that the mayor, etc., did express the opinion that the bill of sale was worthless, but rested their judgment finding the property subject on the evidence stated above as to the levy, the lapse of time,, the action of the mother in the presence of her son, and his failure to assert title.

The certiorari was refused, and claimant excepted. The points made are ruled in the head-notes.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JACKSON, Chief Justice.

[A horse was levied on under a fi.fa. for municipal taxes due the city of Darien', by Mrs. Larkin. It was taken from the premises of the defendant, her son being present at the time. She begged for time, and at her instance, a sale was postponed for over twelve months, nothing being said during that time indicating that it was not her property. (The exact age of the son is not given, but he was a minor.) When the marshal finally advertised the horse for sale, the son, by next friend, interposed a claim. The case was tried before the commissioners of McIntosh county, who were ex-officio mayor, etc., of Darien. Claimant tendered a bill of sale from one Stevens, conveying the horse in question to claimant, in consideration of $18.00. This was signed by a cross mark, but its execution was sworn to by the father of claimant. The court held the bill of [728]*728sale to be a nullity, because there was no attesting witness. Claimant'and his father testified that the possession had been in him ; that he had purchased the horse from Stevens, and owned it. The horse was found subject, and claimant carried the case to the superior court by certiorari. The answer to the writ showed that the mayor, etc., did express the opinion that the bill of sale was worthless, but rested their judgment finding the property subject on the evidence stated above as to the levy, the lapse of time,, the action of the mother in the presence of her son, and his failure to assert title.

The certiorari was refused, and claimant excepted. The points made are ruled in the head-notes.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 Ga. 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larkin-v-city-of-darien-ga-1883.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack