Larkin v. Boyle

304 S.W.3d 214, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1779, 2009 WL 4823922
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 2009·No. WD 69875·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellants Jodicy Larkin and Shana Larkin filed a medical malpractice action against Respondents Maureen Boyle, M.D. and St Joseph Ob-Gyn, Inc., arising out of injuries Jodicy Larkin sustained during her delivery. The jury returned a defense verdict. The Larkins appeal, asserting five Points Relied On which challenge certain of the trial court’s evidentiary rulings, and the court’s refusal to declare a mistrial in response to improper comments by defense counsel in opening statement. After a careful review of the record we find no prejudicial error which would warrant a new trial, and accordingly affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Larkin v. Boyle, 304 S.W.3d 214, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1779, 2009 WL 4823922 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

304 S.W.3d 214 (Larkin v. Boyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related