Larken v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A.

579 So. 2d 891, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5280, 1991 WL 87240
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 28, 1991
DocketNo. 90-1571
StatusPublished

This text of 579 So. 2d 891 (Larken v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larken v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A., 579 So. 2d 891, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5280, 1991 WL 87240 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

CORRECTED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The Larkens appeal from a final summary judgment in an action for default on a promissory note.

We affirm the order of final summary judgment. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966). However, we reverse that portion of the order awarding attorneys’ fees to the appellee and remand to the trial court with directions to comply with the requirements of Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holl v. Talcott
191 So. 2d 40 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)
Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe
472 So. 2d 1145 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
579 So. 2d 891, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5280, 1991 WL 87240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larken-v-barnett-bank-of-south-florida-na-fladistctapp-1991.