Larken v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A.
This text of 579 So. 2d 891 (Larken v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CORRECTED OPINION
The Larkens appeal from a final summary judgment in an action for default on a promissory note.
We affirm the order of final summary judgment. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966). However, we reverse that portion of the order awarding attorneys’ fees to the appellee and remand to the trial court with directions to comply with the requirements of Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
579 So. 2d 891, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5280, 1991 WL 87240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larken-v-barnett-bank-of-south-florida-na-fladistctapp-1991.