Larken Minnesota, Inc. v. Wray

89 F.3d 841, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34651, 1996 WL 362672
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 1, 1996
Docket95-2219
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 F.3d 841 (Larken Minnesota, Inc. v. Wray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larken Minnesota, Inc. v. Wray, 89 F.3d 841, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34651, 1996 WL 362672 (8th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

89 F.3d 841

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
LARKEN MINNESOTA, INC.; Larken, Inc.; Larken Iowa City,
Inc., Appellants,
v.
Dirk A. WRAY; Al Yip, Defendants,
and
Lenora K. CHEN; Pine Hill Minnesota, Inc.; Pine Hill
Minnesota Investments, Inc.; Pine Hill Iowa,
Inc.; Pine Hill Iowa Investments, Inc.,
Appellees.

No. 95-2219.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 1996.
Filed July 1, 1996.

Before BEAM and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Larken Minnesota, Inc., Larken, Inc., and Larken Iowa City, Inc. (collectively, Larken) appeal the district court's2 order requiring Larken to sell its interests in two hotels to the appellees, at the appellees' bid price, pursuant to the deadlock provisions in the partnership agreements. Having reviewed the parties' briefs and submissions, we conclude the judgment of the district court was correct. Accordingly, based upon the well-reasoned opinion of the district court, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

*

The HONORABLE ANDREW W. BOGUE, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation

2

The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Larken, Inc. v. Dirk Wray, - Appellant., Al Yip
189 F.3d 729 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)
Larken, Inc. v. Dirk Wray
Eighth Circuit, 1999

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 F.3d 841, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34651, 1996 WL 362672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larken-minnesota-inc-v-wray-ca8-1996.