Larken Minnesota, Inc. v. Wray
This text of 89 F.3d 841 (Larken Minnesota, Inc. v. Wray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
89 F.3d 841
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
LARKEN MINNESOTA, INC.; Larken, Inc.; Larken Iowa City,
Inc., Appellants,
v.
Dirk A. WRAY; Al Yip, Defendants,
and
Lenora K. CHEN; Pine Hill Minnesota, Inc.; Pine Hill
Minnesota Investments, Inc.; Pine Hill Iowa,
Inc.; Pine Hill Iowa Investments, Inc.,
Appellees.
No. 95-2219.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted June 10, 1996.
Filed July 1, 1996.
Before BEAM and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Larken Minnesota, Inc., Larken, Inc., and Larken Iowa City, Inc. (collectively, Larken) appeal the district court's2 order requiring Larken to sell its interests in two hotels to the appellees, at the appellees' bid price, pursuant to the deadlock provisions in the partnership agreements. Having reviewed the parties' briefs and submissions, we conclude the judgment of the district court was correct. Accordingly, based upon the well-reasoned opinion of the district court, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 F.3d 841, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34651, 1996 WL 362672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larken-minnesota-inc-v-wray-ca8-1996.