Lark v. State

599 So. 2d 289, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6746, 1992 WL 126565
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lark v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 617 So. 2d 782
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 1992·No. No. 91-2206·Published

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

After a review of the record and briefs, we can discern only one issue which requires our attention. As the defendant correctly points out, and the state conceded, an extra forty-two points were assessed on the sentencing guideline score-sheet for legal constraint. The deduction of these points alters the recommended range and the permitted range creating the appearance of a departure sentence without written reasons.

[290]*290Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and the sentence is vacated and remanded to the trial court for resentencing as a departure sentence or for resentencing within the guidelines. State v. Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1989).

AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lark v. State, 599 So. 2d 289, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6746, 1992 WL 126565 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

599 So. 2d 289 (Lark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Betancourt
552 So. 2d 1107 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)