Lark v. Lacy

S.D. New York

Lark v. Lacy

87 F. Supp. 2d 251, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2668, 2000 WL 284429

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lark v. Lacy. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 F. Supp. 2d 449 →

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 14, 2000·No. 99 CIV. 0228(CM)·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

McMAHON, District Judge.

It is hereby:

ORDERED that the Court’s Memorandum Decision Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, 43 F.Supp.2d 449 *252 (S.D.N.Y.1999) (the “Decision”), is hereby VACATED only to the extent that it denied plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. The following parts of the Decision are hereby VACATED: section 1(A), the last sentence of section II preceding section 11(A), section 11(A) (except for section 11(A)(1)(a)), section 11(B), and the first sentence of section III; and it is

ORDERED that this order be sent to West for publication; and it is

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall issue this Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel for the parties as set forth on the list appended hereto pursuant to Rule 77.1 of the Local Civil Rules of this Court and that such issuance of the Order shall constitute service on the parties represented by said counsel.

SO ORDERED:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

McMAHON, District Judge.

It is hereby:

ORDERED that the Court’s Memorandum Decision Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, 43 F.Supp.2d 449 *252 (S.D.N.Y.1999) (the “Decision”), is hereby VACATED only to the extent that it denied plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. The following parts of the Decision are hereby VACATED: section 1(A), the last sentence of section II preceding section 11(A), section 11(A) (except for section 11(A)(1)(a)), section 11(B), and the first sentence of section III; and it is

ORDERED that this order be sent to West for publication; and it is

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall issue this Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel for the parties as set forth on the list appended hereto pursuant to Rule 77.1 of the Local Civil Rules of this Court and that such issuance of the Order shall constitute service on the parties represented by said counsel.

SO ORDERED:

Lark v. Lacy, 87 F. Supp. 2d 251, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2668, 2000 WL 284429 (S.D.N.Y. 2000).

Pincite

87 F. Supp. 2d 251 (Lark v. Lacy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related