Lark v. Board of Trustees of the California State University

Ninth Circuit

Lark v. Board of Trustees of the California State University

452 F. App'x 770

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 6, 2011·No. 10-60020·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Melody L. Lark appeals pro se from the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirming the bankruptcy court’s determination of the non-dischargeability of Lark’s student loans under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo, Rifino v. United States (In re Rifino), 245 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir.2001), and we dismiss.

We cannot review Lark’s challenge to the bankruptcy court’s oral determination of the non-dischargeability of her student loans because Lark failed to include the relevant transcripts in the record on appeal as required by Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2). See Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169-70 (9th Cir.1991) (per curiam) (dismissing appeal for appellant’s failure to provide a transcript).

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM **

Melody L. Lark appeals pro se from the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirming the bankruptcy court’s determination of the non-dischargeability of Lark’s student loans under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo, Rifino v. United States (In re Rifino), 245 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir.2001), and we dismiss.

We cannot review Lark’s challenge to the bankruptcy court’s oral determination of the non-dischargeability of her student loans because Lark failed to include the relevant transcripts in the record on appeal as required by Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2). See Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169-70 (9th Cir.1991) (per curiam) (dismissing appeal for appellant’s failure to provide a transcript).

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Lark v. Board of Trustees of the California State University, 452 F. App'x 770 (9th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

452 F. App'x 770 (Lark v. Board of Trustees of the California State University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related