Largy v. Alpert & Burday, Inc.

258 A.D. 1047, 18 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8806

This text of 258 A.D. 1047 (Largy v. Alpert & Burday, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Largy v. Alpert & Burday, Inc., 258 A.D. 1047, 18 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Judgement affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.; Martin, P. J., and Townley, J., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial on the ground of prejudicial conduct on the part of plaintiffs’ counsel tending to indicate that the license of one of the witnesses was revoked after he had testified at a hearing before the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles in connection with the accident.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
258 A.D. 1047, 18 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/largy-v-alpert-burday-inc-nyappdiv-1940.