Largy v. Alpert & Burday, Inc.

258 A.D. 1047, 18 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8806

Opinion

Judgement affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.; Martin, P. J., and Townley, J., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial on the ground of prejudicial conduct on the part of plaintiffs’ counsel tending to indicate that the license of one of the witnesses was revoked after he had testified at a hearing before the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles in connection with the accident.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Largy v. Alpert & Burday, Inc., 258 A.D. 1047, 18 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

258 A.D. 1047 (Largy v. Alpert & Burday, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.