Largent v. Arnold

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Largent v. Arnold

133 So. 2d 580

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 20, 1961·No. No. 2028·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in an action of ejectment. The case involves a boundary dispute.

[581]*581The lower court announced that it would enter a directed verdict in favor of the defendants and the plaintiff took a nonsuit.

For an explanation of the principles of law involved where a deficiency or surplus of distances or acreage is involved, see Akin v. Godwin, Fla.1950, 49 So.2d 604; Kahn v. Delaware Securities Corporation, 114 Fla. 32, 153 So. 308; Wildeboer v. Hack, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 29; 8 Am. Jur., Boundaries, § 71, and 97 A.L.R. Annotation page 1227.

Affirmed.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., KANNER, J., and MILLEDGE, STANLEY, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in an action of ejectment. The case involves a boundary dispute.

[581]*581The lower court announced that it would enter a directed verdict in favor of the defendants and the plaintiff took a nonsuit.

For an explanation of the principles of law involved where a deficiency or surplus of distances or acreage is involved, see Akin v. Godwin, Fla.1950, 49 So.2d 604; Kahn v. Delaware Securities Corporation, 114 Fla. 32, 153 So. 308; Wildeboer v. Hack, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 29; 8 Am. Jur., Boundaries, § 71, and 97 A.L.R. Annotation page 1227.

Affirmed.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., KANNER, J., and MILLEDGE, STANLEY, Associate Judge, concur.

Largent v. Arnold, 133 So. 2d 580 (Fla. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

133 So. 2d 580 (Largent v. Arnold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related