Largen v. McClellan

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Largen v. McClellan

29 Conn. Supp. 518

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas·Decided July 3, 1972·No. File No. 97407·Published

Opinion

Martin, J.

This automobile negligence case was tried to the court while a companion case was tried to the jury. The jury returned a verdict against both the plaintiff and the defendant in this action.

The defendant, however, failed to plead contributory negligence as required by § 52-114 of the General Statutes, and that defense is not available to him.

Accordingly, judgment may enter for the plaintiff to recover of the defendant the snm of $1055.50 plus costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin, J.

This automobile negligence case was tried to the court while a companion case was tried to the jury. The jury returned a verdict against both the plaintiff and the defendant in this action.

The defendant, however, failed to plead contributory negligence as required by § 52-114 of the General Statutes, and that defense is not available to him.

Accordingly, judgment may enter for the plaintiff to recover of the defendant the snm of $1055.50 plus costs.

Largen v. McClellan, 29 Conn. Supp. 518 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1972).

Pincite

29 Conn. Supp. 518 (Largen v. McClellan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.