Largen v. McClellan

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Largen v. McClellan

29 Conn. Supp. 518

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

DecidedJuly 3, 1972

DocketFile No. 97407

StatusPublished

This text of 29 Conn. Supp. 518 (Largen v. McClellan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Largen v. McClellan, 29 Conn. Supp. 518 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Martin, J.

This automobile negligence case was tried to the court while a companion case was tried to the jury. The jury returned a verdict against both the plaintiff and the defendant in this action.

The defendant, however, failed to plead contributory negligence as required by § 52-114 of the General Statutes, and that defense is not available to him.

Accordingly, judgment may enter for the plaintiff to recover of the defendant the snm of $1055.50 plus costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin, J.

This automobile negligence case was tried to the court while a companion case was tried to the jury. The jury returned a verdict against both the plaintiff and the defendant in this action.

The defendant, however, failed to plead contributory negligence as required by § 52-114 of the General Statutes, and that defense is not available to him.

Accordingly, judgment may enter for the plaintiff to recover of the defendant the snm of $1055.50 plus costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Conn. Supp. 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/largen-v-mcclellan-pactcompl-1972.