Largen v. McClellan

Connecticut Superior Court

Largen v. McClellan

294 A.2d 336, 29 Conn. Super. Ct. 518, 29 Conn. Supp. 518, 1972 Conn. Super. LEXIS 189

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedJuly 3, 1972

DocketFile No. 97407

StatusPublished

This text of 294 A.2d 336 (Largen v. McClellan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Largen v. McClellan, 294 A.2d 336, 29 Conn. Super. Ct. 518, 29 Conn. Supp. 518, 1972 Conn. Super. LEXIS 189 (Colo. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

This automobile negligence case was tried to the court while a companion case was tried to the jury. The jury returned a verdict against both the plaintiff and the defendant in this action.

The defendant, however, failed to plead contributory negligence as required by § 52-114 of the General Statutes, and that defense is not available to him.

Accordingly, judgment may enter for the plaintiff to recover of the defendant the sum of $1055.50 plus costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This automobile negligence case was tried to the court while a companion case was tried to the jury. The jury returned a verdict against both the plaintiff and the defendant in this action.

The defendant, however, failed to plead contributory negligence as required by § 52-114 of the General Statutes, and that defense is not available to him.

Accordingly, judgment may enter for the plaintiff to recover of the defendant the sum of $1055.50 plus costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 A.2d 336, 29 Conn. Super. Ct. 518, 29 Conn. Supp. 518, 1972 Conn. Super. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/largen-v-mcclellan-connsuperct-1972.