Large v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Large v. State

184 S.W. 197, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 425

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 8, 1916·No. No. 3975·Published

Opinion

DAYIDSON, J.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault; his punishment being assessed at a fine of $25.

There is nothing in the motion for new trial that can be considered in the absence of the testimony, and nothing presented by bill of exceptions. In fact, there is neither a statement of the facts nor a bill of exceptions in the record.

There being nothing to review in this appeal, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAYIDSON, J.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault; his punishment being assessed at a fine of $25.

There is nothing in the motion for new trial that can be considered in the absence of the testimony, and nothing presented by bill of exceptions. In fact, there is neither a statement of the facts nor a bill of exceptions in the record.

There being nothing to review in this appeal, the judgment will be affirmed.

Large v. State, 184 S.W. 197, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 425 (Tex. 1916).

Pincite

184 S.W. 197 (Large v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.