Large v. Large

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Large v. Large

1923 OK 790, 219 P. 293, 95 Okla. 284, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 164

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 16, 1923

Docket12541

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1923 OK 790 (Large v. Large) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Large v. Large, 1923 OK 790, 219 P. 293, 95 Okla. 284, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 164 (Okla. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

KENNAMER, J.

Grace M. Large, plaintiff, instituted this action in the district court of Pawnee county against A. C. Large, defendant, to obtain a decree of divorce upon the ground of extreme cruelty. The trial court, upon the evidence introduced in the trial of the cause, granted the plaintiff a decree of divorce. Defendant, A. C. Large, prosecutes this appeal to reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The only question raised in the appeal presents the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment of the trial court. We have carefully examined the evidence, and it is our conclusion that the judgment entered is supported by sufficient evidence. It therefore necessarily follows that the judgment must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KENNAMER, J.

Grace M. Large, plaintiff, instituted this action in the district court of Pawnee county against A. C. Large, defendant, to obtain a decree of divorce upon the ground of extreme cruelty. The trial court, upon the evidence introduced in the trial of the cause, granted the plaintiff a decree of divorce. Defendant, A. C. Large, prosecutes this appeal to reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The only question raised in the appeal presents the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment of the trial court. We have carefully examined the evidence, and it is our conclusion that the judgment entered is supported by sufficient evidence. It therefore necessarily follows that the judgment must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK 790, 219 P. 293, 95 Okla. 284, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/large-v-large-okla-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack