Larcher v. Scott
2 Ala. 40
Opinion
— The statute regulating appeals, requires the justice of the peace who decides the cause, to send a statement of it to the appellate Court; but his omission to do so, certainly ought not to prejudice either party. The recital of the judgment, which is contained in the condition of the appeal bond, furnishes sufficient evidence of its existence. [McAlpin v. Paul, Minor, 316.] The County Court should have proceeded to try the cause de novo.
Let the judgment be reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Larcher v. Scott, 2 Ala. 40 (Ala. 1841).
2 Ala. 40 (Larcher v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte Finley
20 So. 2d 98 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1944)
J. E. Paterson Lumber Co. v. Ingersoll
147 So. 140 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Union Mut. Ins. Co. v. Robinson
113 So. 587 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)
Hudgens v. Creola Lumber Co.
51 So. 525 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)
Andrews v. Burton
50 So. 359 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)
Goodrich v. Peterson
74 P. 497 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1903)
Hardee v. Abraham
133 Ala. 341 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1901)
Gresham v. Tucker
28 Ala. 611 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1856)