Laratoga Wet Wash Laundry, Inc. v. Weinstein
This text of 237 A.D. 906 (Laratoga Wet Wash Laundry, Inc. v. Weinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion for an injunction pendente lite affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to the right of plaintiff to renew the motion if the defendant does not serve his answer promptly and proceed to [907]*907trial without delay as he has agreed in his answering affidavit. No opinion. Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 A.D. 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laratoga-wet-wash-laundry-inc-v-weinstein-nyappdiv-1933.