Larason v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Larason v. State

729 So. 2d 494, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3852, 1999 WL 162579

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 26, 1999

DocketNo. 97-00497

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 729 So. 2d 494 (Larason v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Larason v. State, 729 So. 2d 494, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3852, 1999 WL 162579 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Acting Chief Judge.

Scott Larason moved to dismiss a charge of driving without a license on the basis that a driver’s license is not required to operate a moped on a private highway. The court denied his motion and he pleaded nolo con-tendere, reserving his right to appeal the denial of this dispositive motion. We have decided this issue contrary to Larason’s position, see Jones v. State, 721 So.2d 320 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), and affirm the circuit court. Larason’s judgment and sentence, however, incorrectly state that he pleaded guilty to the charge. We remand with directions to correct these documents to reflect his plea of no contest. Larason need not be present for the correction.

Conviction affirmed, judgment and sentence remanded for correction.

CASANUEVA, J., and QUINCE, PEGGY A., Associate Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NORTHCUTT, Acting Chief Judge.

Scott Larason moved to dismiss a charge of driving without a license on the basis that a driver’s license is not required to operate a moped on a private highway. The court denied his motion and he pleaded nolo con-tendere, reserving his right to appeal the denial of this dispositive motion. We have decided this issue contrary to Larason’s position, see Jones v. State, 721 So.2d 320 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), and affirm the circuit court. Larason’s judgment and sentence, however, incorrectly state that he pleaded guilty to the charge. We remand with directions to correct these documents to reflect his plea of no contest. Larason need not be present for the correction.

Conviction affirmed, judgment and sentence remanded for correction.

CASANUEVA, J., and QUINCE, PEGGY A., Associate Judge, Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

729 So. 2d 494, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3852, 1999 WL 162579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larason-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack