Larami Metal Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Larami Metal Co. v. United States

27 Cust. Ct. 371, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1288

United States Customs Court·Decided December 5, 1951·No. No. 56117; protest 170326-K (Baltimore)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of aluminum scrap; that said scrap is a nonferrous material in chief value of metal; and that it is secondhand or waste or refuse, fit only to be remanu-factured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of aluminum scrap; that said scrap is a nonferrous material in chief value of metal; and that it is secondhand or waste or refuse, fit only to be remanu-factured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Larami Metal Co. v. United States, 27 Cust. Ct. 371, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1288 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

27 Cust. Ct. 371 (Larami Metal Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.