Lara v. State

268 S.W.3d 421, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1040, 2008 WL 2962320

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Antonio Martinez-Lara appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion, in which the motion court found that the failure of plea counsel to inform him of parole requirements was a collateral consequence of the plea, and, therefore, plea counsel was effective.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).