Lara v. State
868 So. 2d 1224, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3295, 2004 WL 575711
Opinions
Affirmed. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2003); Bradley v. State, 787 So.2d 732, 743-44 (Fla.2001); Murphy v. Int’l Robotic Sys., Inc., 766 So.2d 1010, 1028-29 (Fla.2000); State v. Jano, 524 So.2d 660, 661-62 (Fla.1988); Bell v. State, 847 So.2d 558, 560-61 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Pino v. State, 776 So.2d 1081 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lara v. State, 868 So. 2d 1224, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3295, 2004 WL 575711 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
868 So. 2d 1224 (Lara v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Dixon
684 P.2d 725 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1984)
Bell v. State
847 So. 2d 558 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
First v. State
696 So. 2d 1357 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.
766 So. 2d 1010 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
State v. Jano
524 So. 2d 660 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Goodwin v. State
751 So. 2d 537 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Reyes v. State
580 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Bradley v. State
787 So. 2d 732 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Card v. State
803 So. 2d 613 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
State v. Justice
637 N.E.2d 85 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1994)
Pino v. State
776 So. 2d 1081 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)