Lara v. Granader Realty, Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lara v. Granader Realty, Corp.

56 A.D.2d 618, 867 N.Y.S.2d 350

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 618 (Lara v. Granader Realty, Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lara v. Granader Realty, Corp., 56 A.D.2d 618, 867 N.Y.S.2d 350 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Eartnow, J), dated September 4, 2007, as granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendants Grenadier Realty Corp. and Ocean Gate Associates which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

[619]*619Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and that branch of the cross motion of the defendants Grenadier Realty Corp. and Ocean Gate Associates which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them is denied.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of that branch of the cross motion of the defendants Grenadier Realty Corp. and Ocean Gate Associates which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Ritter, J.E, Florio, Miller and Garni, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Eartnow, J), dated September 4, 2007, as granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendants Grenadier Realty Corp. and Ocean Gate Associates which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

[619]*619Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and that branch of the cross motion of the defendants Grenadier Realty Corp. and Ocean Gate Associates which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them is denied.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of that branch of the cross motion of the defendants Grenadier Realty Corp. and Ocean Gate Associates which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Ritter, J.E, Florio, Miller and Garni, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 618, 867 N.Y.S.2d 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lara-v-granader-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack