Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Lara v. 1010 E. Tremont Realty Corp.

Lara v. 1010 E. Tremont Realty Corp.

205 A.D.2d 468, 614 N.Y.S.2d 6
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 30, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 468 (Lara v. 1010 E. Tremont Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lara v. 1010 E. Tremont Realty Corp., 205 A.D.2d 468, 614 N.Y.S.2d 6 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered November 15, 1993, which granted plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the individual defendants’ affirmative defense of lack of jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that the three attempts to serve the individual defendants at their home, the first at 7:25 A.M., the second six days later at 9:09 p.m., and the third the next day at 11:45 A.M., all on weekdays, constituted "due diligence” justifying service under CPLR 308 (4) (see, Hochhauser v Bungeroth, 179 AD2d 431). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sartor v. Utica Taxi Center, Inc.
260 F. Supp. 2d 670 (S.D. New York, 2003)
Colonial National Bank, U.S.A. v. Jacobs
188 Misc. 2d 87 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2000)
Yihye v. Blumenberg
260 A.D.2d 371 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Vento v. City of New York
247 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 A.D.2d 468, 614 N.Y.S.2d 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lara-v-1010-e-tremont-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1994.