L.A.R. v. State

563 So. 2d 836, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5018, 1990 WL 95447
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 12, 1990·No. No. 89-1379·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the restitution order. The losses on which the order was based were clearly not caused by the offenses to which appellant pled guilty. The remaining charge was nolle-prossed on a negotiated plea with no reservation for restitution.

REVERSED.

DANIEL, C.J., and COWART and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

L.A.R. v. State, 563 So. 2d 836, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5018, 1990 WL 95447 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

563 So. 2d 836 (L.A.R. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Triplett v. State
709 So. 2d 107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Hebert v. State
600 So. 2d 1293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)