Laquer v. Smith, Barney, Harris, Upham & Co.

446 So. 2d 1119, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12101
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 28, 1984
DocketNo. 83-1220
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 446 So. 2d 1119 (Laquer v. Smith, Barney, Harris, Upham & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laquer v. Smith, Barney, Harris, Upham & Co., 446 So. 2d 1119, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12101 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the order under review is quashed insofar as said order directs the parties to proceed to arbitration in this cause. Young v. Oppenheimer & Co., 434 So.2d 369 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Shearson, Hammill & Co. v. Vouis, 247 So.2d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 253 So.2d 444 (Fla.1971). The petition for a writ of cer-tiorari is denied, however, as to that portion of the order under review which dismisses count VI of the complaint, as the petitioner has a full and adequate remedy by appeal from the final judgment when entered in this cause. See Brooks v. Owens, 97 So.2d 693, 695 (Fla.1957). The cause is remanded, for further proceedings below.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sabates v. International Med. Centers, Inc.
450 So. 2d 514 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
446 So. 2d 1119, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laquer-v-smith-barney-harris-upham-co-fladistctapp-1984.