Laprade v. North Carolina Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Laprade v. North Carolina Railroad

56 S.E.2d 597, 231 N.C. 343

DecidedDecember 14, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 56 S.E.2d 597 (Laprade v. North Carolina Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Laprade v. North Carolina Railroad, 56 S.E.2d 597, 231 N.C. 343 (N.C. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff appealed from an adverse judgment based upon the verdict of the jury, on the issue of contributory negligence. An examination of the record in the light of the several exceptions noted by the plaintiff fails to disclose any substantial error in the trial of the case, either in the admission of testimony or in the court’s instructions to the jury. The case involved controverted questions of fact which on the determinative issue of contributory negligence the triers of the facts have resolved against the plaintiff. The result will not be disturbed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff appealed from an adverse judgment based upon the verdict of the jury, on the issue of contributory negligence. An examination of the record in the light of the several exceptions noted by the plaintiff fails to disclose any substantial error in the trial of the case, either in the admission of testimony or in the court’s instructions to the jury. The case involved controverted questions of fact which on the determinative issue of contributory negligence the triers of the facts have resolved against the plaintiff. The result will not be disturbed.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 S.E.2d 597, 231 N.C. 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laprade-v-north-carolina-railroad-nc-1949.