Lappano-Colletta v. Manhattan College

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lappano-Colletta v. Manhattan College

41 A.D.2d 929, 344 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4304

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 31, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.2d 929 (Lappano-Colletta v. Manhattan College) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lappano-Colletta v. Manhattan College, 41 A.D.2d 929, 344 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4304 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated February 21, 1973, unanimously confirmed, without costs and without disbursements, and the petition dismissed. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Markewieh, Kupferman and Steuer, JJ.; Nunez, J., concurs in the following memorandum: While I join my colleagues in confirmance, I fully agree with the finding of the Appeal Board that respondent college is guilty of an unconscionable exploitation of appellant’s time and talents. The recommendation against tenure made by five tenured colleagues of the appellant by the narrow margin of one vote was arbitrary and capricious and should not have been approved by the college’s Committee on Promotions and Tenure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated February 21, 1973, unanimously confirmed, without costs and without disbursements, and the petition dismissed. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Markewieh, Kupferman and Steuer, JJ.; Nunez, J., concurs in the following memorandum: While I join my colleagues in confirmance, I fully agree with the finding of the Appeal Board that respondent college is guilty of an unconscionable exploitation of appellant’s time and talents. The recommendation against tenure made by five tenured colleagues of the appellant by the narrow margin of one vote was arbitrary and capricious and should not have been approved by the college’s Committee on Promotions and Tenure.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.2d 929, 344 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lappano-colletta-v-manhattan-college-nyappdiv-1973.