Lapointe v. Kennebec County Comm'rs
This text of Lapointe v. Kennebec County Comm'rs (Lapointe v. Kennebec County Comm'rs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT
CIVIL ACTION KENNEBEG , ss. DOCKET NO. AP-04-10 ' SKS~ Key i= 5 huaoe4
ANDREA M. LAPOINTE and MICHAEL T. BARDEN,
Petitioners
Vv. ORDER
KENNEBEC COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, moines
Respondents
UN a
This matter came on for hearing on the appeal of the plaintiffs from a decision of the Kennebec County Commissioners (County Commissioners Court) denying the plaintiffs an abatement of the real estate tax valuation on their property as established by the City of Hallowell. The plaintiffs assert procedural irregularities, which they believe have deprived them of their Due Process rights. In this regard, the plaintiffs have requested a trial of the facts.
The response by the Kennebec County Commissioners was succinct in that it merely pointed out that the plaintiffs had the wrong party, citing Shawmut Inn v. Town of Kennebunkport, 428 A.2d 384, 388 (Me. 1981). The court concludes that the Commissioners are correct. Just as an appeal to the Law Court from a decision of the Superior Court does not make the Superior Court the appropriate appellee, so to an appeal from the County Commissioners Court to the Superior Court does not make the County Commissioners an appropriate appellee. The appellants were placed on notice of this deficiency and rather then amend their complaint to state the proper party opponent, they chose to argue the point. Since the appellants’ argument does not
prevail, the appeal must be dismissed. Therefore, the entry will be:
The appeal against the Kennebec County Commissioners is DISMISSED for stating the wrong party.
Dated: May. 2 , 2004. Medihur
S. Kirk Studstrup , Justice, Superior Court Date Filed 2/12/04 Kennebec Docket No. AP04-10 County Action Petition for Review 80B . STUDSTRyp
Andrea M. Lapointe & Michael T. BardenVYs- Kennebec County Commissioners Plaintiff's Attorney Defendant’s Attorney
Andrea Lapointe & Michael Barden, Pro Se George-M.-Jabar;-Ti3 "Esq.
10 Academy Street One-Center-Street———
Hallowell, Maine 04347 Watervittes Matne-—0490T=5425
~WARREN SHAY ESQ PO BOX 467 SKOWHEGAN MAINE 04976
Date of Entry
2/11/04 Complaint, filed. s/Lapointe s/Barden, Pro Se
2/17/04: Notice of briefing schedule sent to PI1tf.
2/20/04 Acknowledgment of Receipt of Summons and Complaint or Post~. lgment Motion.served on Kennebec County Commissioners on 2/11/04. Hearing documents, filed. -
2/23/04 Letter entering appearance, filed. s/Jabar, II, Esq.
2/27/04 Brief of Plaintiffs, filed. s/Andrea Lapointe & Michael T. Berden, Pro Se Motion for Trial of the Facts, filed. s/Lapointe s/Barden, Pro Se Proposed Order, filed.
3/3/04 Letter Requesting any proceedings to be recorded, filed. s/A. Lapointe, Pro se Plaintiff.
3/9/04 Defendant's Objection to the Plaintiffs' Motion for a Trial of the Facts, filed. s/Jabar, II, Esq. Brief of Defendant, filed. s/Jabar, II, Esq.
3/11/05 Reply Brief of Plaintiffs, filed. s/Andrea M. Lapointe, Pro Se
3/24/04 Motion to Withdraw, filed. s/Jabar, II, Esq. Certificate of Service, filed. s/Jabar, II, Esq.
3/24/04 MOTION TO WITHDRAW, Studstrup, J. Motion granted. George Jabar, Esq. allowed to withdraw. Copies mailed to attys of record.
3/31/04 Reply Brief to Defendant's objection to the Plaintiff's Motion for a Tria
of the Facts, filed. s/Lapointe, Pro Se
Noiice of setting for 515) of .
sent to attorneys of recor.
seterrilh
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lapointe v. Kennebec County Comm'rs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lapointe-v-kennebec-county-commrs-mesuperct-2004.