Lapof v. Postulnick
This text of 232 A.D. 832 (Lapof v. Postulnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to open the default after failure to deliver undertaking as ordered affirmed. Appeal from judgment dismissed, with costs. The appeal from judgment entered pursuant to a previous order entered on default, from which order no appeal was taken, is not reviewable and must be dismissed as a matter of law. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 557, subd. 1; Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. Extension D. Co., Nos. 1-4, 154 App. Div. 305.) Appeals from orders dated August 13 and August 23, 1930, are dismissed, having been abandoned. Lazansky, P. • J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D. 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lapof-v-postulnick-nyappdiv-1931.