LaPlume v. Mullen

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

LaPlume v. Mullen

316 A.2d 349, 112 R.I. 947, 1974 R.I. LEXIS 1572

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedMarch 14, 1974

DocketM. P. No. 74-53

StatusPublished

This text of 316 A.2d 349 (LaPlume v. Mullen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

LaPlume v. Mullen, 316 A.2d 349, 112 R.I. 947, 1974 R.I. LEXIS 1572 (R.I. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Respondent directed to file his answer to the petition [948]*948for writ of habeas corpus 'and'therein to show cause, if any, why the writ should not issue as.prayed and why petitioner should not be admitted to bail, said answer to. be made in compliance with the provisions of Rule. 14. The stay of the Superior Court order entered on March 1, 1974 shall continue in effect until further order of court.

Lynch, Walsh & Cobleigh, John D. Lynch, for petitioner. Richard J. Israel, Attorney. General, for respondent. Roberts, Q. J. not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Respondent directed to file his answer to the petition [948]*948for writ of habeas corpus 'and'therein to show cause, if any, why the writ should not issue as.prayed and why petitioner should not be admitted to bail, said answer to. be made in compliance with the provisions of Rule. 14. The stay of the Superior Court order entered on March 1, 1974 shall continue in effect until further order of court.

Lynch, Walsh & Cobleigh, John D. Lynch, for petitioner. Richard J. Israel, Attorney. General, for respondent. Roberts, Q. J. not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

316 A.2d 349, 112 R.I. 947, 1974 R.I. LEXIS 1572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laplume-v-mullen-ri-1974.