LaPlace Sand Co., Inc. v. Troxler

712 So. 2d 1077, 98 La.App. 5 Cir. 36, 1998 La. App. LEXIS 1482, 1998 WL 265093
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 27, 1998
Docket98-CA-36
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 712 So. 2d 1077 (LaPlace Sand Co., Inc. v. Troxler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
LaPlace Sand Co., Inc. v. Troxler, 712 So. 2d 1077, 98 La.App. 5 Cir. 36, 1998 La. App. LEXIS 1482, 1998 WL 265093 (La. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

712 So.2d 1077 (1998)

LaPLACE SAND COMPANY, INC.
v.
Ronald TROXLER.

No. 98-CA-36.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.

May 27, 1998.

Michael S. Weinberg, Destrehan, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert R. Faucheux, Jr., Paul P. Tusa, LaPlace, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GAUDIN, DUFRESNE and CANNELLA, JJ.

DUFRESNE, Judge.

Appellant, Ronald Troxler, attempts to appeal the district court judgment of May 15, 1997 which overruled his peremptory exceptions *1078 of no right of action and no cause of action. LSA-C.C.P. art. 2083 authorizes appeals from final judgments or from interlocutory judgments which may cause irreparable harm. LSA-C.C.P. art. 1841 defines a final judgment as "a judgment that determines the merits in whole or in part," whereas an interlocutory judgment is one "that does not determine the merits but only preliminary matters in the course of the action."

The denial of exceptions of no cause of action and no right of action are interlocutory judgments and are not appealable where there has been no showing of irreparable harm. Fitch v. Fitch, 549 So.2d 420 (La.App. 5 Cir.1989); Schnatz v. Schnatz, 501 So.2d 318 (La.App. 5 Cir.), writ denied, 504 So.2d 877 (La.1987); Box v. French Market Corp., 593 So.2d 836 (La.App. 4 Cir.1992). In the present case, there has been so showing of irreparable harm. In fact, counsel for appellant did not even respond to this court's rule to show cause issued on February 23, 1998, why this appeal should not be dismissed.

An appellate court may dismiss an appeal on its own motion where there is no right to appeal. LSA-C.C.P. art. 2162. Powell v. Liberty Lloyds Ins. Co., 589 So.2d 593 (La. App. 5 Cir.1991). As there is no right to appeal from the district court's May 15, 1997 interlocutory judgment, we dismiss the instant appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trust for Schwegmann v. Schwegmann Family Trust
51 So. 3d 737 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010)
Bianchini v. Muggivan
40 So. 3d 157 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010)
Davis v. Sze Tin Wong
927 So. 2d 581 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2006)
Levine v. First Nat. Bank of Commerce
738 So. 2d 133 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
712 So. 2d 1077, 98 La.App. 5 Cir. 36, 1998 La. App. LEXIS 1482, 1998 WL 265093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laplace-sand-co-inc-v-troxler-lactapp-1998.