Lapinski v. Guardiano

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lapinski v. Guardiano

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 6, 2016

Docket5D15-3281

StatusPublished

This text of Lapinski v. Guardiano (Lapinski v. Guardiano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lapinski v. Guardiano, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JAMES LAPINSKI,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D15-3281

STEVEN GUARDIANO, DAYTONA BEACH SHORES, ET AL.,

Appellees.

________________________________/

Opinion filed June 7, 2016

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, William A. Parsons, Judge.

James Lapinski, Port Orange, pro se.

Steven J. Guardiano, Daytona Beach, for Appellees, St. Croix Condominium, Inc. and Steven J. Guardiano.

Lonnie N. Groot, of Stenstrom, McIntosh, Colbert & Whigham, P.A, Lake Mary, for Appellee, City of Daytona Beach Shores.

Jamie E. Seaman, DeLand, for Appellee, County of Volusia.

Robert Alden Swift, of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees, St. Croix Condominium, Inc., BRI Management, Inc., Sandi Dembinsky, Jennifer Campen, Gary Chandler, Jerry Azeff, John Wender Jr., Joe Bandy, and Harry King. PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

EVANDER, COHEN, and BERGER, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI