LaPierre v. Martin
89 S.E. 1074, 145 Ga. 851, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 513
Opinion
1. Remaindermen, whose estate is vested subject to divestiture upon their death before the life-tenant, can not, during the existence of the precedent life-estate, maintain a suit to cancel a deed executed by the life-tenant individually and also as their trustee, purporting to convey the estate in solido. Latham v. Inman, 88 Ga. 505 (15 S. E. 8).
2. Eor the foregoing reason the court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
LaPierre v. Martin, 89 S.E. 1074, 145 Ga. 851, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 513 (Ga. 1916).
89 S.E. 1074 (LaPierre v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fulton National Bank v. Randall
61 S.E.2d 122 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Wright v. Conner
37 S.E.2d 353 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Gurr v. Gurr
32 S.E.2d 507 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Stout v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
189 S.E. 248 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)