Lapides v. Lapides

228 A.D. 669
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1929
Docket(Appeal No. 1)
StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D. 669 (Lapides v. Lapides) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lapides v. Lapides, 228 A.D. 669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

f reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff, without costs. The evidence fairly preponderates in support of the allegations of the plaintiff, and, therefore, the complaint should not have been dismissed, but, on the contrary, judgment should have been granted for the relief demanded. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. Young, Kapper and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs for reversal but votes for a new trial; Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to affirm. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D. 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lapides-v-lapides-nyappdiv-1929.