Lapham v. Tarabusi

Michigan Supreme Court

Lapham v. Tarabusi

225 N.W. 483, 247 Mich. 380, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 753

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJune 3, 1929

DocketDocket No. 143, Calendar No. 34,288.

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 225 N.W. 483 (Lapham v. Tarabusi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lapham v. Tarabusi, 225 N.W. 483, 247 Mich. 380, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 753 (Mich. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiffs brought summary proceedings against defendants. There was judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants bring error claiming want of jurisdiction because of no personal service of summons on defendants. The attorneys for the parties stipulated in writing to continue the case from August 6, 1928, to August 13, 1928. Such stipulation for continuance amounts to a general appearance. *Page 381 4 C. J. p. 1345; Waldron v. Palmer, 104 Mich. 556. The circuit court commissioner acquired jurisdiction. A general appeal was taken to the circuit court. This amounted to a general appearance (4 C. J. p. 1346), and conferred jurisdiction on the circuit court. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

NORTH, C.J., and FEAD, FELLOWS, WIEST, CLARK, McDONALD, and SHARPE, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiffs brought summary proceedings against defendants. There was judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants bring error claiming want of jurisdiction because of no personal service of summons on defendants. The attorneys for the parties stipulated in writing to continue the case from August 6, 1928, to August 13, 1928. Such stipulation for continuance amounts to a general appearance. *Page 381 4 C. J. p. 1345; Waldron v. Palmer, 104 Mich. 556. The circuit court commissioner acquired jurisdiction. A general appeal was taken to the circuit court. This amounted to a general appearance (4 C. J. p. 1346), and conferred jurisdiction on the circuit court. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

NORTH, C.J., and FEAD, FELLOWS, WIEST, CLARK, McDONALD, and SHARPE, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 N.W. 483, 247 Mich. 380, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lapham-v-tarabusi-mich-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack