Lapham v. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided September 28, 2020·No. 5:19-cv-00579·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION

MICHAEL LAPHAM,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:19-cv-579-Oc-34PRL

FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION and SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT,

Defendants.

O R D E R

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report & Recommendation (Dkt. No. 35; Report) entered by the Honorable Philip R. Lammens, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 21, 2020. In the Report, Judge Lammens recommends that Defendant Southwest Florida Water Management District’s (SWFMD) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 25) and Defendant Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s (FWC) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 26) both be denied. See Report at 13. To date, no objections to the Report have been filed, and the time for doing so has passed. The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). If no specific objections to findings of facts are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the district court must review legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8-FtM-29SPC, 2007 WL 1428615, at * 1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007). Upon independent review of the file and for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report, the Court will accept and adopt the legal and factual conclusions recommended by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. The Report & Recommendation (Dkt. No. 35) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 2. Defendant Southwest Florida Water Management District's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 25) is DENIED. 3. Defendant Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 26) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers this 25th day of September, 2020.

United States District Judge

i49 Copies to: Counsel of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lapham v. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, (M.D. Fla. 2020).

Lapham v. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (Lapham v. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marina Cooper-Houston v. Southern Railway Company
37 F.3d 603 (Eleventh Circuit, 1994)
Garvey v. Vaughn
993 F.2d 776 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)