Lape, Michael Bruce

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 13, 2013
DocketWR-78,897-01
StatusPublished

This text of Lape, Michael Bruce (Lape, Michael Bruce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lape, Michael Bruce, (Tex. 2013).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-78,897-01
EX PARTE MICHAEL BRUCE LAPE , Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 12-05-05234-CR IN THE 221ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to twenty-five years' imprisonment.

Applicant contends that he is actually innocent based on laboratory testing that revealed the substance he possessed was not a controlled substance. The trial court signed two sets of agreed findings of fact and conclusions of law, finding that the substance Applicant possessed was not a controlled substance, and concluding that Applicant is actually innocent of the offense. The trial court recommended that relief be granted. However, the habeas record does not contain the report of the laboratory testing from the Texas Department of Public Safety or any other evidence in support of the findings.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine if Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall supplement the writ record with the DPS laboratory report and any other documentation supporting its agreed findings of fact. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has supplemented the habeas record, which shall be forwarded, along with any supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, within 60 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.



Filed: February 13, 2013

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lape, Michael Bruce, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lape-michael-bruce-texcrimapp-2013.