Lapan v. County Commissioners

65 Me. 160, 1876 Me. LEXIS 37
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided August 5, 1876·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Virgin, J.

Th & pro forma ruling that upon the facts disclosed by the documentary evidence in the case, the prayer of the petitioner could not, as matter of law, be granted, was correct. A writ of certiorari lies only to correct errors in law; and where the record contains no error, the writ cannot be issued.

The petitioner’s complaint is in general terms that the county commissioners did not, within one year after the census of 1870, divide the county into jury districts in accordance with the provisions of R. S., c. 106, §§ 6 and 7.

The original record of March 8th, 1871, did not show a compliance with the statute mentioned. The county commissioners declare that the division was in fact made at that time; and at the January term, 1875, upon the evidence then before them, they amended their record in accordance with the facts. This they had an undoubted right to do. Dresden v. Co. Com, 62 Maine, 365. Gloucester v. Co. Com., 116 Mass., 579 and cases. In the record as amended, there is no error. Exceptions overruled.

Appleton, C. J., Walton, Barrows, Daneoetii and Reters, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lapan v. County Commissioners, 65 Me. 160, 1876 Me. LEXIS 37 (Me. 1876).

65 Me. 160 (Lapan v. County Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. Wilkins
203 A.2d 682 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1964)
Toulouse v. Board of Zoning Adjustment
87 A.2d 670 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1952)
Board of School Trustees v. Woodrow Independent School Dist.
90 S.W.2d 333 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Olympian-Tribune Publishing Co. v. Byrne
68 P. 335 (Washington Supreme Court, 1902)
Dryden v. Swinburne
20 W. Va. 89 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1882)