Lap v. Thibault

348 So. 2d 622
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 8, 1977
DocketNo. 76-953
StatusPublished

This text of 348 So. 2d 622 (Lap v. Thibault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lap v. Thibault, 348 So. 2d 622 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the entire record in this cause and find no reversible error. While the analogy of the fiduciary duty of a trustee to protect the trust res is appealing, the doctrine of separation of powers must restrict the judicial branch of the government, when faced, as here, with the question of issuing a mandatory injunction to require a municipality to file legal action to recover city property, to a determination of whether the municipality’s action involves illegality or a palpable abuse of authority amounting to illegality or is fraudulent or clearly oppressive. Hathaway v. Monroe, 97 Fla. 28, 119 So. 149 (1929); McDowell v. Trustees of Internal Improvement Fund, 90 So.2d 715, 718 (Fla.1956).

Affirmed.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., and HARRY W. FOGLE, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDowell v. Trustees of Internal Improvement Fund
90 So. 2d 715 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Hathaway v. Munroe
119 So. 149 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 So. 2d 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lap-v-thibault-fladistctapp-1977.