Lao v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN

82 So. 3d 1225
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 28, 2012
Docket1D12-0585
StatusPublished

This text of 82 So. 3d 1225 (Lao v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lao v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN, 82 So. 3d 1225 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

82 So.3d 1225 (2012)

L.A.O., Mother of D.K., D.O., L.O., L.O., D.O., minor children, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Ron Ringo, Attorney, Ada Dixon, Supervisor, Antione Williams, Sean Parker, Investigator, and Families First Network, Jeanie Atherton, Supervisor, Charlene Southhall, Case Worker, and Guardian ad Litem of Florida Circuit 1, Michael Harris, Respondents.

No. 1D12-0585.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 28, 2012.

L.A.O., Pensacola, pro se, Petitioner.

Ward L. Metzger, Children's Legal Services, Jacksonville; Kelly Schaeffer, Guardian Ad Litem, Tavares, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(c), the petition for writ of mandamus is treated as a petition for writ of certiorari, and is dismissed as untimely filed.

ROBERTS, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 So. 3d 1225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lao-v-department-of-children-fladistctapp-2012.