Lanzisera v. Epstein
This text of 210 A.D.2d 456 (Lanzisera v. Epstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Leis, J.), dated June 17, 1993, which denied his motion to restore the action to the calendar.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We find no basis on this record to disturb the Supreme Court’s conclusion that the plaintiff’s motion was totally lacking in merit. O’Brien, J. P., Hart, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
210 A.D.2d 456, 620 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanzisera-v-epstein-nyappdiv-1994.