Lanza v. Ryan
This text of 259 A.D. 1086 (Lanza v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding for a peremptory mandamus order, petitioner appeals from so much of an order as, among other things, grants respondents’ motion to strike from the bill of costs as retaxed certain specified items, and from so much of the same order as refuses to allow certain other items of petitioner. Appeal dismissed, without costs. In view of our determination in Matter of Lanza v. Ryan (ante, p. 1086), decided herewith, reversing the final order of peremptory mandamus herein and granting a new trial, the appeal has become academic. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1117.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 1086, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanza-v-ryan-nyappdiv-1940.