Lanza v. Ryan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lanza v. Ryan

242 A.D. 711

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D. 711 (Lanza v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lanza v. Ryan, 242 A.D. 711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Peremptory order of mandamus reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. The only issue of fact in this case was: Was petitioner a substitute teacher of physics or was be a laboratory assistant? The finding in favor of the former was against the weight of the evidence. If petitioner was a laboratory assistant, then he was not entitled to any credit for services rendered in teaching in order to procure his license as a teacher of physics. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peremptory order of mandamus reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. The only issue of fact in this case was: Was petitioner a substitute teacher of physics or was be a laboratory assistant? The finding in favor of the former was against the weight of the evidence. If petitioner was a laboratory assistant, then he was not entitled to any credit for services rendered in teaching in order to procure his license as a teacher of physics. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D. 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanza-v-ryan-nyappdiv-1934.