Lanza v. Kaye

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lanza v. Kaye

151 A.D.2d 648, 543 N.Y.S.2d 932, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8173

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 19, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 151 A.D.2d 648 (Lanza v. Kaye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lanza v. Kaye, 151 A.D.2d 648, 543 N.Y.S.2d 932, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant Sylvia Kaye appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), entered March 31, [649]*6491988, as (1) denied that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against her, and (2) granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ cross motion which was for summary judgment as against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the Supreme Court properly awarded summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff purchasers against the defendant Sylvia Kaye. Brown, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for breach of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant Sylvia Kaye appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), entered March 31, [649]*6491988, as (1) denied that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against her, and (2) granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ cross motion which was for summary judgment as against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the Supreme Court properly awarded summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff purchasers against the defendant Sylvia Kaye. Brown, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 A.D.2d 648, 543 N.Y.S.2d 932, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanza-v-kaye-nyappdiv-1989.