Lantz v. State

2005 WY 66, 114 P.3d 1246, 2005 Wyo. LEXIS 77, 2005 WL 1538919
Wyoming Supreme Court·Decided June 8, 2005·No. No. 04-222·Published

Opinion

ORDER AFFIRMING THE JUDGMENT and Sentence of the DistRict Court

This matter came before the Court upon its own motion in connection with its Order Granting Permission for Court Appointed Counsel to Withdraw and Conditionally Affirming the Judgment and Sentence of the District Court, entered by this Court on April 19, 2005. That Order provided that the District Court’s Judgment and Sentence would be summarily affirmed unless the appellant, Michael Joseph Lantz, on or before June 1, 2005, raised points of his choosing which convinced the Court that the appeal herein is less than wholly frivolous. Taking notice that the appellant, Michael Joseph Lantz, has failed to raise such points with this Court within the time allotted, the Court, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), finds that the judgment and sentence in this matter should be affirmed. It is, therefore,

ORDERED that the District Court’s Judgment and Sentence be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

BY THE COURT:

M William U. Hill WILLIAM U. HILL Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lantz v. State, 2005 WY 66, 114 P.3d 1246, 2005 Wyo. LEXIS 77, 2005 WL 1538919 (Wyo. 2005).

2005 WY 66 (Lantz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)